George W. Bush Is Beng Sued For War Crimes! LIVE COVERAGE CALIFORNIA'S 9th Circuit George W. Bush Is Beng Sued For War Crimes! LIVE COVERAGE CALIFORNIA'S 9th Circuit
By Martin Hill
LibertyFight.com
Dec. 12, 2016


ABOUT THIS SITE MOST RECENT ARTICLESRADIO INTERVIEWSVIDEOS
ZIONISM FREEMASONRYFILMING COPSFIGHTING TRAFFIC TICKETS
9/11= Inside Job VACCINES= POISONRED-LIGHT CAMERASEUGENICS=MURDER
NEW SECTION: CATHOLICISM LibertyFight.com CLASSICSHISTORICAL QUOTESALL WARS ARE BANKERS WARS!


The case was dismissed in 2014 but the plaintiff is appealing today. The court convened at 9AM Pacific time but the Saleh v. Bush case is slated to be heard toward the end of the docket today. The 9th Circuit is live streaming the events. Watch live here: More info on the case is below.

The lawyer representing the plaintiff is Inder Comar, his Twitter page is here , and his website is ComarLaw.com.


UPDATE 11:37AM: I was fortunate enough to have caught the entire hearing. It was 32 minutes in length, and you can watch it below in the final 32 minutes of the embedded video. The three judges heard from three lawyers; first up was the plaintiff's attorney Inder Comar. They were pretty tough on him and seemed to scoff at his argument, repeatedly asking basically why, if the defendants were conducting their jobs as federal employees in the scope of their employment, why are they not protected under existing law.

The black judge on the right even asks, (paraphrasing here) "If Wolfowitz is walking down some stairs to plot an illegal war and trips and falls down and gets injured, is he covered under workers comp? Was he acting in the scope of his employment or not?"

Comar seems a bit befuddled by such an absurd question, and stammers a bit. He keeps citing case law, but the female judge asks him to just explain his case to them in plain language, which I found interesting.

Up next was another lawyer with an amicus brief arguing also on the side of the plaintiff. Lastly was the attorney for the United States. Surprisingly. the court seemed to grill him quite extensively and after hearing all his arguments, asked, is there ANYTHING that federal employees could do that wouldn't be excused under immunity laws? (Such as, a motivation of personal financial enrichment or personal revenge "for what they did to George H.W. Bush."

The man replied, "Maybe," but added that financial gain was not cited as a motive by the plaintiffs in this case.

The U.S. lawyer argued that simply having a personal motivation for war on the half of the defendants would not meet the standards in this case.

The court then allowed Comar to give a brief closing argument and adjourned, The hearing was completed, and they left for the day. They did not rule at this time, they will do that in writing.

Wow, 32 minutes is all our 'justice system' grants for a war with untold millions of deaths and consequences of Biblical proportions. Amazing.


The thing I found most surprising and interesting is that the judges wanted them to talk in 'plain language'.

When you think about the enormity of this situation, here someone is calling into question a case of war with millions killed and they are given 32 minutes for the proceedings. I've seen TRAFFIC TICKET and small claims trials where the hearing or appeal lasts longer than that. They seemed to have a predetermined decision and seemed very cavalier about the whole thing. I guess Americans are numb to this whole war thing. It's like its not real, and the rulers are simply above reproach.

The court's docket calender notes: "Sundus Saleh v. George Bush - Sundus Saleh appeals the district court's dismissal of Saleh's diversity putative class action brought against former President Bush and Bush administration officials alleging that they broke the law when they engaged in war with Iraq. [3:13-cv-01124-JST]."

Watch the video here: Go to 1:07:33 (one hour, and 7 minutes & 33 seconds) where this hearing begins.


The press release about the lawsuit against Bush is below.

Visit WhatReallyHappened.com for the latest daily news. Mike Rivero also has a great 3-hour daily radio show which I listen to. Very informative.

You can find the most recent articles from LibertyFight.com here.

To get notice of the latest material you can follow LibertyFight on Twitter or contact me to join our e-mail list.

NOTE: The 'DISQUS' feature has been added to this site so you can leave your comments below. No login is required, you can post as a guest. [WRH link: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/content/george-w-bush-beng-sued-war-crimes-live-coverage-californias-9th-circuit.]


San Francisco, Calif. - Today the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit confirmed that Circuit Judges Susan Graber and Andrew Hurwitz, as well as District Court Judge Richard Boulware (sitting by designation) will hear oral argument on December 12, 2016, in Saleh v. Bush.

Saleh v. Bush involves claims by an Iraqi woman, Sundus Shaker Saleh, that former President George W. Bush and other high ranking Bush-era officials broke the law when they planned and waged the Iraq War.

Saleh alleges that former Bush Administration leaders committed the crime of aggression when they planned and executed the Iraq War, a war crime that was called the "supreme international crime" at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.

Saleh is appealing the immunity provided to the Defendants by the district court in December 2014.

"We are pleased that the Ninth Circuit will hear argument. To my knowledge, this is the first time a court will entertain arguments that the Iraq War was illegal under domestic and international law," Saleh’s attorney D. Inder Comar, legal director at Comar LLP, said. "This is also the first time since World War II that a court is being asked to scrutinize whether the war itself was an illegal act of aggression — a special war crime that was defined at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946." Comar is handling Saleh's case pro bono.

Assuming the oral argument takes place, the argument will be live streamed and recorded on the Ninth Circuit's YouTube channel, permitting members of the public to watch the argument. The Court’s calendar commences at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on December 12th; the case will likely be heard later in the morning, as it is last on the Court's calendar.

In addition to former President Bush, Saleh has named former Administration officials Richard Cheney, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz as defendants in the case.

In December 2014, the district court dismissed Saleh's lawsuit, holding that the defendants were immune from further proceedings because of the federal Westfall Act of 1988 (28 U.S.C. § 2679). The Westfall Act immunizes former federal officials in civil lawsuits if a court determines that the official was acting pursuant to the legitimate scope of his or her employment.

Saleh disputes the immunity, arguing that the planning and waging of a war of aggression against Iraq fell outside the legitimate scope of employment of former President Bush and the other defendants.

Link: http://witnessiraq.com/blog/


Featured Articles From LibertyFight.com:


RECENT FROM LibertyFight.com:

Front-Row Protester Disrupts Trump's Michigan Speech with "ISRAEL DID 9/11! FIVE JEWS ARRESTED ON 9/11 IN NEW JERSEY, NOT MUSLIMS." Donald Trump Responds To "ISRAEL DID 9/11" Protester With "He's A Trump Guy, He's very committed, Got a lot of energy, He's on our side" (!!!)

Trump's Response To "Israel Did 9/11" Front-Row Heckler Is Almost More Interesting Than The Heckle Itself TV News Footage Of Martin Hill Being Escorted Out By Secret Service While Trump Stops His Speech To Watch & Repeatedly Tells Them "Don't Hurt Him, Be Very Nice..."

HERE IS THE CLOSE-UP VERSION. GO TO MINUTE 20. Trump says that the "Israel Did 9/11' Protester is "A Trump Guy, He's On Our Side, He's Very Committed, he's Got a lot of energy."

Here is the wide-shot footage from the back of the room. If you watch starting at around minute 20, That's when I interrupt him, and he responds to me. Then a few minutes later, he stops his speech again to watch the Secret Service take me out, and he is referring to me when he says: [21:18] Oh! Don't hurt him. Don't hurt him. Be very nice. Be very nice. Yep. Be nice to him. Don't hurt him. See how nice I'm being? I'm only doing it for them, you know that (points to the media) Don't hurt him! (21:34) Tell me, ... I love you too, maam.. Look. Is there more fun than a Trump rally? (21:48) Is there more fun?

Misc:


Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured in the Los Angeles Daily News, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 TV Los Angeles, The Press Enterprise, LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened.com, Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com, Economic Policy Journal, TargetLiberty.com, FreedomsPhoenix, Haaretz, TMZ, Veterans Today, Jonathan Turley blog, The Dr. Katherine Albrecht Show, National Motorists Association, AmericanFreePress.net, RomanCatholicReport.com, WorldNetDaily, HenryMakow.com, OverdriveOnline.com, Educate-Yourself.org, TexeMarrs.com, Dr. Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show, Strike-The-Root.com, Pasadena Weekly, ActivistPost.com, Los Angeles Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI AM 640, IamtheWitness.com, Redlands Daily Facts, SaveTheMales.ca, BlackBoxVoting, The Michael Badnarik Show, The Wayne Madsen Report, Devvy.com, Rense.com, FromTheTrenchesWorldReport.com, BeforeItsNews.com, The Contra Costa Times, Pasadena Star News, Silicon Valley Mercury News, Long Beach Press Telegram, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, L.A. Harbor Daily Breeze, CopBlock.org, DavidIcke.com, Whittier Daily News, KCLA FM Hollywood, The Fullerton Observer, Antiwar.com, From The Trenches World Report, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com and DontWakeMeUp.Org.



FAIR USE NOTICE: The above may be copyrighted material, and the use of it on LibertyFight.com may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available on a non-profit basis for educational and discussion purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 USC S. 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

You can follow LibertyFight.com on Twitter and re-tweet this article here.
Tweets by @LibertyFight

comments powered by Disqus