San Bernardino CA District Attorney Michael Ramos Goes On Radio Discussing Possibility Of Third Shooter in December 'Terrorist Attack'
By Martin Hill
March 21, 2016


San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael Ramos has participated in a bombshell interview which until this point has remained somewhat obscure. But his facts exonerate those who have been referred to as 'conspiracy theorists.' Mike Ramos, a Republican who has been the D.A. for 14 years, is determined to find out about this alleged third shooter. Ramos recently spoke to the 'John and Ken Show' on KFI AM 640 Radio Los Angeles, discussing the possibility of a third shooter in the San Bernardino, California 'Terrorist attack.'

According to all establishment accounts, the blame for the mass murder of fourteen people at the Inland Regional Center has been decidedly and conclusively placed on an alleged Muslim married couple, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, who had recently had a baby. They were killed in a shootout with police the same day of the shooting, December 2, 2015.

However, many researchers have questioned the official story, such as Dr. Kevin Barrett, who recently published a book titled ANOTHER French False Flag?: Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino. Barrett wrote up a summary of his book here: ANOTHER French False Flag published on Charlie Hebdo anniversary.

As LibertyFight broke the story at the time, multiple witnesses reported seeing "three white men" dressed in military gear. Inland Regional Center employee Sally Abdelmageed and others who worked at the center reported seeing three shooters, as the shooting was happening.

On December 7th, Barrett picked up the story and reported: BUSTED! San Bernadino shooters were three white men dressed in military attire Official story is "dead on arrival"

"My frequent radio guest Martin Hill (listen to Friday’s interview) has discovered another bombshell that blows the official story of the San Bernadino shooting to smithereens. In his new post Martin writes:
“Witness Sally Abdelmageed, who works at the Inland Regional Center and witnessed the shooting in San Bernardino, was interviewed live via telephone by CBS Evening News the day the massacre happened.

“The news anchor begins ‘She saw the attackers enter the building, and we spoke to her by phone.’

‘We saw three men dressed in military attire,’ she says. ‘I couldn’t see his face, he had a black hat on… black cargo pants on, the kind with zippers on the side… He had a huge assault rifle a lot of ammo…

She continues, ‘They opened up the door to building then he starts to, you know, shoot all over into the room – that’s the room we have conferences in…

‘I called 911 and I just hid under my desk.. As I was talking to the dispatch, we went into my manager’s office and locked the doors..’

‘Mrs. Abdelmageed, can you describe to me in as much details as you can what did the gunman look like?’ the CBS anchor asks.

‘I couldn’t see his face, he had a black hat on. All I could see was a black hat, black long-sleeved shirt… He had extra ammo. He was probably ready for something, to reload – I don’t know know… I just saw three, dressed exactly the same. They looked like they were athletic build, and um, they appeared to be tall…’

‘You’re certain that you saw three men?’ the news anchor asks.

‘Yeah,’ she replies, as she continues to describe the THREE WHITE MEN, their muscular build, etc.

After she leaves the line, the anchor insists ‘and of course we’ve just learned that one of the suspects was actually a woman.'”

[Read Martin Hill’s full report, "Witness to San Bernardino Massacre Describes Shooters As Three White Men “Dressed In Military Attire"]

Also, as the actual shooting occurred, long before Sally Abdelmageed and other witnesses and news networks reported three shooters, published a story from our source, a retired NYPD officer, who was monitoring the police scanners in real time. The police on the scanners said to BE ON THE LOOKOUT for three hispanic or Muslim suspects. This story was also run on top independent news website as events unfolded that day. [See San Bernardino Shooting: Police Scanner Said Be On The Lookout For "Hispanic or Middle Eastern Males," Media Omits Info .]

58-year-old Michael E. Ramos, a Republican, has been the San Bernardino County D.A. since Jamnuary 2002. On KFI, Ramos discussed the legal case between Apple and the FBI about the iPhone evidence, as well as a "possible third gunman."

When asked about who was leading the investigation, Ramos replied "I know the FBI obviously is on the lead on this" but continued "I consider myself part of the team, it's the U.S. Attorney is handling the criminal case right now, what we have left of the criminal case... but there's always that possiblity, you know I'm the San Bernardino District Attorney, thats why this issue is so important to me about what information is on that phone, uh perhaps leading to other individuals or other crimes that occurred we would prosecute here locally ... you know the bottom line is we're just trying to I turn over every rock and look at every piece of evidence, and this is huge. This is a huge piece of evidence that we need to take a look at."

John Kobylt asks Ramos "What's the indication that there might be a third shooter involved in the attack?"

Ramos replies "You know I will tell you this, that the FBI has done a tremendous amount of work in this area, and so has the San Bernardino Police Department and the Sheriffs. But there's still some information out there that a couple of the victims that were in the building themselves said it's possible they thought that there was a third person. Now we don't have any other corroborating evidence that there was a third person, but shouldn't we look at everything? I mean think about it. They were communicating on that phone."

John continues "there were a couple witnesses they absolutely insist-"

Ken interjects "I remember the first day or two there were a lot of people insisting that, and then it kind of faded."

Ramos replies "yeah. And so my thing is, hey! Well let's - here's a piece of evidence, that could really help us with that one issue. That's just one issue we could take a look at. And a judge has made a ruling. a federal magistrate, through probable cause, the 4th Amendment to the Constutution, and I truly believe Apple has the duty to give us that information."

Ramos continues to discuss the legal brief his office filed in federal court, and cyber security.

"You know, I don't put anything past terrorists," Ramos continued, saying that if they were able to get the evidence from the one phone, "it's gonna help us, assist us not only to perhaps to find out if anybody eles was involved, but also to elimate the fears of my victims that are still afraid for their lives in San Bernardino County."

Asked if anyone suspected anything about the suspect farook ahead of time, Ramos replies no, that "in fact he had befriended most of these people. I mean for God's sake, some of these county employees i think one who lost their lives, who was in that room gave he and his wife a baby shower. Umm, so, he was a county emoployee, and he was you know, conducting his um, premeditation for this terrorist attack in total secret. Just like terrorists do."

Ramos said he has a March 22 court date on the issue, and that this case will probabaly have appeals and may even end up in the U.S. Supreme Court. "I mean this is a big issue," Ramos says.

John Kobylt then asks "do you fear other attacks in San Bernardino, immediate attacks? Because that there might have been other participants in this, in the background?

Ramos replies "I don't know if I fear, but I sure would like to eliminate that, you know- any- any- thoughts that there might be. And the best way to eliminate it is to take a look at whats on this phone."

Ken agrees, "Yeah you're doing your job, you want to tear through evreything that Syed Rizwan Farook did as far as communication, and anything on the computers and the phone..."

Ramos replies "absolutely. I don't want another victim in my county."

You may contact Mike Ramos office here:

Listen to the seven minute clip here:

[NOTE: Lest anyone think that Clearchannel's "John and Ken" are serious truth-seekers, don't be misled by this interview. They are the most statist government-bootlicking clowns you've ever heard. They support gun control and the government version of every false flag. I've gotten on their show several times to expose 9/11 and other issues and they always get so very pissed that I got through to millions of their listeners before they could hang up on me. I exposed John, who poses as a populist, as a gun-control advocate when he was shilling for disaster Schwarzenegger, who banned .50 cal ammo as soon as he got into office. I will post the videos of those calls in a bit.]


  • 'Third Prominent Eyewitness' to the San Bernardino Shooting? Not So Fast.
    There's plenty of documented evidence that the San Bernardino shooting is not what we're being told. Multiple eyewitness reported three shooters, along with several TV and print newscasts referring to the hunt for three shooters. There were also active shooter drills going on that the same time. However, this latest claim that is circulating on conspiracy sites about a 'third prominent eyewitness' who was called and told to change his story does not pass the smell test. Christopher Nwadike, a co-worker of Sayd Farook, was interviewed by the L.A. Times, Wall Street Journal, and many others where he admitted that he was in the bathroom the whole time when the shooting started and hid on the floor until rescue crews arrived to the bathroom. He can barely speak English, and never saw ANY shooter, much less his co-worker and his Muslim wife, or three tall white military men, or anyone else. Also, it's the very L.A. Times video of Nwadike that is circulating on conspiracy sites, as 'proof' of a false flag. Nowhere does either Nwadike or the L.A. Times claim that Nwadike saw the shooters, and they certainly never claim that Nwadike was called by some "secretive ominous guy" telling him to change his story. There's plenty of legit evidence here, let's not poison the well.

    Clearchannel Hosts Thwarted During Hassan 9/11 Propaganda Session
    KFI's statists John & Ken are so frustrated when a caller gets through on air to talk about the 9/11 inside job before getting cut off. :-)

    Featured Articles From

    You can find the most recent articles from here.

    To get notice of the latest material you can follow LibertyFight on Twitter or contact me to join our e-mail list.

    NOTE: The 'DISQUS' feature has been added to this site so you can leave your comments below. No login is required, you can post as a guest.

    NOTE: Do you think my site ugly? hard to read? outdated? Does it look like a site from the 1990's? I hear these type complaints sometimes, often enough to get my attention. If that is the case, please leave your comments below. You can also click the link here for the cookie-cutter corporate 'blogger' version of this article:

    [WRH Link:]


    Front-Row Protester Disrupts Trump's Michigan Speech with "ISRAEL DID 9/11! FIVE JEWS ARRESTED ON 9/11 IN NEW JERSEY, NOT MUSLIMS." Donald Trump Responds To "ISRAEL DID 9/11" Protester With "He's A Trump Guy, He's very committed, Got a lot of energy, He's on our side" (!!!)

    Trump's Response To "Israel Did 9/11" Front-Row Heckler Is Almost More Interesting Than The Heckle Itself TV News Footage Of Martin Hill Being Escorted Out By Secret Service While Trump Stops His Speech To Watch & Repeatedly Tells Them "Don't Hurt Him, Be Very Nice..."

    HERE IS THE CLOSE-UP VERSION. GO TO MINUTE 20. Trump says that the "Israel Did 9/11' Protester is "A Trump Guy, He's On Our Side, He's Very Committed, he's Got a lot of energy."

    Here is the wide-shot footage from the back of the room. If you watch starting at around minute 20, That's when I interrupt him, and he responds to me. Then a few minutes later, he stops his speech again to watch the Secret Service take me out, and he is referring to me when he says: [21:18] Oh! Don't hurt him. Don't hurt him. Be very nice. Be very nice. Yep. Be nice to him. Don't hurt him. See how nice I'm being? I'm only doing it for them, you know that (points to the media) Don't hurt him! (21:34) Tell me, ... I love you too, maam.. Look. Is there more fun than a Trump rally? (21:48) Is there more fun?


    Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured in the Los Angeles Daily News, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 TV Los Angeles, The Press Enterprise,,,,, Economic Policy Journal,, FreedomsPhoenix, Haaretz, TMZ, Veterans Today, Jonathan Turley blog, The Dr. Katherine Albrecht Show, National Motorists Association,,, WorldNetDaily,,,,, Dr. Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show,, Pasadena Weekly,, Los Angeles Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI AM 640,, Redlands Daily Facts,, BlackBoxVoting, The Michael Badnarik Show, The Wayne Madsen Report,,,,, The Contra Costa Times, Pasadena Star News, Silicon Valley Mercury News, Long Beach Press Telegram, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, L.A. Harbor Daily Breeze,,, Whittier Daily News, KCLA FM Hollywood, The Fullerton Observer,, From The Trenches World Report, and many others. Archives can be found at and DontWakeMeUp.Org.

    You can follow on Twitter and re-tweet this article here.

    comments powered by Disqus